Pages

Sunday, April 29, 2012

LORD OF THE RINGS

The Lord of the Rings is one hundred million times better than Harry Potter. The Lord of the Rings is a more creative and better written series than Harry Potter. Authors write about sorcerers and dragons all the time, but J R R Tolkien basically (this is a hyperbole) coined the term hobbit. Throughout the Harry Potter series, the plot of the individual books seem to become watered down. I get the feeling that Rowling was thrilled by a lucky instance of success and was rushed to write sequels. Tolkien is excellent at creating imagery; hence the excellent movies. In a movie face-off, The Lord of the Rings slays Harry Potter. The visuals are so much better and the characters are less of nerds. Harry Potter would be the Smeegle of The Lord of the Rings because he is, simply, funny looking. Mr. Logsdon has spent a few class periods showing us the filming set of The Lord of the Rings; Australia is beautiful. It blows my mind that a real place on Earth looks like the books' settings! That is my next vacation spot FO SHO.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.